For example, EWG’s recommendation about which sunscreens consumers should use (i.e. More importantly, the claims made by EWG could actually keep consumers from using sunscreen altogether. “Year after year, EWG’s shopping guide contains little new information in comparison to their previous reports, and their 2020 edition is no different. It is unfortunate that at precisely the time that COVID-19 stay at home orders are being lifted and Americans may be heading to beaches and pools, the Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) 2020 Guide to Sunscreens attempts to needlessly scare consumers with false claims and misinformation that can be potentially harmful to public health. Sunscreen is a crucial and well-recognized step in the fight against skin cancer. So until they actually come out with that sunscreen pill I’ve read about keep using your sunscreen every day – no matter what.Lisa Powers, (202) 297-1232, Kurke, (202) 258-5285, D.C. – “The cosmetics and personal care products industry is proud of the innovative sunscreen products we provide to help protect consumers from the harmful effects of the sun’s ultraviolet (UV) rays. Lastly, one of the things that bothers me the most about the EWG’s sunscreen reports is the fact that they are all doom and gloom and frankly, I am afraid that people might stop using sunscreen because of all the doom and gloom in their report. Secondly I agree with the statement that the FDA’s new regulations on sunscreen are LONG overdue. The first one is about how high spf numbers (like spf 100) are ridiculous and ultimately create more harm than good. Having said that there two parts of the sunscreen report that I do agree with. If you prefer to follow the EWG’s recommendations than go for it, but please keep in mind that they are one opinion among many about sunscreens. For example many experts completely disagree with the EWG’s claims about Vitamin A in sunscreens. All their scary claims are controversial. In my humble opinion it comes down to this – just as you shouldn’t believe every skincare claim by beauty and cosmetic companies you also need to take what the EWG says about sunscreens with a grain of salt. Needless to say, the 2010 EWG sunscreen report got a ton of media attention and, in my opinion, created a ton of unnecessary hysteria. Below I’ve listed my other posts about the 2010 EWG sunscreen report. Throughout the year I posted updated information in this blog on the EWG report. Last year I took my time reading through the 2010 EWG sunscreen report and writing a response here in my blog. And nearly one in three products in the guide are still laced with vitamin A ingredients that accelerate the growth of skin tumors and lesions according to recent government studies. ![]() The sunscreen industry continues to load store shelves with bottles listing misleading, sky-high SPF ratings that may protect against UVB rays that cause sunburn but leave skin at risk for UVA damage. Of the more than 600 beach and sports sunscreens analyzed by Environmental Working Group for our 2011 Sunscreen Guide, we can only recommend one in five. Is your sunscreen actually protecting your family as advertised? Or are some of the claims just marketing hype? Here’s a sample of the EWG’s scare tactics: ![]() ![]() As always the EWG uses scary language and offers even more disturbing “facts” (more on that later on in this post) to the consumer about sunscreens. Here’s the thing – besides changing both its product recommendations and the products that they hate there is nothing different in this report from the 2010 report. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has issued its annual, damning sunscreen report for 2011.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |